Epstein Secrets

likelihood that the Eleventh Circuit will agree. Indeed, the Court's opinion creates an incentive for attorneys not to do precisely what Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), was intended to encourage attorneys to do: reduce facts, ideas, and opinions to writing. A return to the days of settlement/p

ry" as authority for its submission of the above documents under seal. The November 8, 2011 order refers to certain collateral evidence gathered in Federal Grand Jury Proceeding 05-02 and Federal Grand Jury Proceeding 07-103 (WPB) [DE 121-1, page 15], matters having little, if any, relevance to the issues fr

995 - Dec 1996) Current Residents at Address: DOS:age:0 xxx-xx-)ozcx issued In TEXAS between 01/01/1975 and 12/31/1975 Names A ' with Relative: TAYLOR DOS: age: xxx-Kg-)oca issued in TEXAS between 01/01/1975Ind 12/31/1975 Active Address(es): ItION FRISCO TX 750344258, DENTON COUNTY (Oct 2001 -Jul

After the final call she accepted, requested to speak with an attorney at which point the interview was concluded. The agents then served with a Federal Grand Jury subpoena. Investigation on 08/21/2007 at New Canaan, Connecticut nk N 31 - - Date dictated 08/21/2007 SA by SA This document contai

opposing parties and their counsel." Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 510 (1947). The privilege is codi

1. On April 16, 2007, the Court granted the government's Sealed Motion in a Sealed Order. Exhibit 3. Judge Middlebrooks was the judge who empaneled Federal Grand Jury 07-103. The Sealed Order states, in part, that the "Order shall be SEALED in accordance with Fed. R. 2 EFTA00086378 Crim. P. 6(e)(6), excep