Epstein Secrets

ideration Epstein et at vs. Fancelli Paneling, Inc. Case No. ST-I 0-CV443 "Library Cabinetry"). As third party beneficiaries of that contract with Fancelli, Plaintiffs filed suit against Fancelli for breach of contract and negligence because the Library Cabinetry is defective and its installation was i

against Fancelli for breach of contract and negligence because the Library Cabinetry is defective and its installation was improper and incomplete. Fancelli was served with the Summons and First Amended Complaint on December 3, 2010. On December 30, 2010, Plaintiffs and JP and Molyneux entered into a co

). As third party beneficiaries of that contract with Fancelli, Plaintiffs filed suit against Fancelli for breach of contract and negligence because the Library Cabinetry is defective and its installation was improper and incomplete. Fancelli was served with the Summons and First Amended Complaint on December 3, 201

hich was in excess $780,000, plus additional expenses incurred to correct the defects in the Library Cabinetry, the loss of use of the funds paid to Fancelli through Molyneux; and the loss of time and effort of the Plaintiffs' staff, and the expenditure of funds, in the attempt to obtain Fancelli's perfo

e Pavilion and Library Cabinetry which are the subject of the Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. C. Affidavit of Juan Pablo Molyneux relating to the Library Cabinetry. D. Video of incomplete and defective Library Cabinetry in the Office Pavilion on Little Saint James Island. E. All documents and things produce

wood paneling for the library of the Office Pavilion (the "Library Cabinetry"). Under third party beneficiary status, Plaintiffs filed suit against Fancelli for breach cn EFTA00307562 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER ENTERED MAY 24, 2011 Epstein e

THIS COURT'S ORDER ENTERED MAY 24, 2011 Epstein etab vs. Fanelli Paneling, Inc. Super. Cs Case No. ST-10-CV-443 of contract and negligence because the Library Cabinetry is defective and installation was incomplete. Plaintiffs and Molyneux entered into a confidential settlement agreement and release (the "Confidenti