4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
6 / 4
Mentions
t 7:22 PM Subject: Fwd: epstein/little st james/fancelli To: Jeevacation Epstein [email protected]> Please advise how you want me to handle. If Fancelli and Molyneux resolved their issues, why are we providing a list? I would like to tell her that Fancelli and Molyneux met last week and resolved all
Please advise how you want me to handle. If Fancelli and Molyneux resolved their issues, why are we providing a list? I would like to tell her that Fancelli and Molyneux met last week and resolved all their issues regarding the punch list, which I sent to you (Donna Glasgow) in August. As to service of p
rom: Donna Glasgow [mato' Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 12:54 PM To: EFTA00732239 Cc: Subject: epstein/little st james/fancelli Darren, Peter Edelman has been on trial and has been unable to respond to you. So as not to lose time, and without responding directly to your e-mail to him, can you conf
ct: Re: stj - cpstcin SEPT 8th Punch list Importance: High For Settlement Purposes Only - Without Prejudice Donna, In addition to the work on what Fancelli refers to as the September 8 punch list, I understand that the following are also to be properly addressed and corrected: The sliding window shutte
s what Fancelli is now referring to as the September 8 punchlist. If that is the case, please confirm that it contains all of the work to be done by Fancelli, so we can formalize an agreement, or whether we can even use it as the punchlist to be included with additional, new work to be agreed upon. Thank
enting the agreement between Molyneux and Epstein. If that is not the case we must revert to the earlier punchlist that you sent to me, and to which Peter Edelman responded. Please respond to that letter as requested, so we can move this along. Thank you. Donna Glasgow, M. 110 East 59th Street 25th Floor
0077 ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED MEMO TO: Darren Indyke Peter Edelman FROM: Jay Goldberg DATE: September 14, 2010 RE: Molyneux, Epstein and Fancelli We should all be anxious to resolve this matter. I think Darren should call Peter; and Peter you should call Darren, to coordinate a time and place
2/2 LAW OFFICES OF JAY GOLDBERG, 250 PARK AVENUE TWENTIETH FLOOR NEW YORK. NY 10177-0077 ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED MEMO TO: Darren Indyke Peter Edelman FROM: Jay Goldberg DATE: September 14, 2010 RE: Molyneux, Epstein and Fancelli We should all be anxious to resolve this matter. I think Darren
nversation with Mr. Fanelli and his French Attorney regarding your letter to me dated September 10, 2012, which we forwarded to them yesterday. Mr. Fancelli's comments pertaining to the discussion you referenced therein differs in several respects. called Mr. Fancelli speaking French, but he could hear
ave sufficient opportunity to carefully inspect the subject work for use in mediation, settlement and/or the litigation of this action. Since cc: Peter Edelman. Esq. Jean Francois Guyot, Esq. Fancelli Paneling, Inc. A. Jeffrey Weiss. Esq. reston E. Moore EFTA00621950
Entities connected to both Fancelli and Peter Edelman