Epstein Secrets

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant "admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

D arrested at meeting site. 03- Joesph Poignant 1 [None] Use of intemet and 13068 telephone to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 03- David Brautigam I [None] D met u/c officer (posing 20043 as 13 y.o. girl) on intemet chat service. D (using 2 usernames) had sexually explicit conversation w

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant "admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doc to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

ted at meeting site. 03- 13068 Joesph Poignant 1 [None] Use of intemet and telephone to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 03- 20043 David Brautigam 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o. girl) on intemet chat service. D (using 2 usernames) had sexually explicit conversation with of

there, in facts far different from those presented here, the defendant admitted using both a cellular telephone and a land-line telephone to entice Jane Doe to engage in prostitution" (emphasis added). That admission makes Evans no precedent for a prosecution here, since there is no evidence the phones

D arrested at meeting site. 03- Joesph Poignant I [None] Use of intemet and 13068 telephone to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 03- David Brautigam I [None] D met u/c officer (posing 20043 as 13 y.o. girl) on internet chat service. D (using 2 usernames) had sexually explicit conversation