Epstein Secrets

xpenses, deposition related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by_ysiu in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and is

s personal financial information at issue, courts will compel production of personal financial information. Friedman, 863 So. 2d at 194; Woodward v. Berkey, 714 So. 2d 1027, 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). A party's finances, if relevant to the disputed issues of the underlying action, are not excepted from

expenses, deposition related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and

s personal financial information at issue, courts will compel production of personal financial information. Friedman, 863 So. 2d at 194; Woodward v. Berkey, 714 So. 2d 1027, 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). A party's finances, if relevant to the disputed issues of the underlying action, are not excepted from

expenses, deposition related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and

s personal financial information at issue, courts will compel production of personal financial information. Friedman, 863 So. 2d at 194; Woodward v. Berkey, 714 So. 2d 1027, 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). A party's finances, if relevant to the disputed issues of the underlying action, are not excepted from