Epstein Secrets

xpenses, deposition related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by_ysiu in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and is

ts that this Court enter an Order Striking Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Objections to Epstein's Discovery Requests' and Compelling Edwards to produce documents and/or Interrogatory responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstan

expenses, deposition related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and

ts that this Court enter an Order Striking Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Objections to Epstein's Discovery Requests' and Compelling Edwards to produce documents and/or Interrogatory responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstan

expenses, deposition related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and

ts that this Court enter an Order Striking Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley Edwards's ("Edwards") Objections to Epstein's Discovery Requests' and Compelling Edwards to produce documents and/or Interrogatory responses responsive to Epstein's Requests. In support thereof, Epstein states: I Them are still outstan