Epstein Secrets

RE II Deoksbor 5th and nide it clear to all parties that 10 12 exhibits that. here net disclosed by the end of II For Non-Parties L.M., E.M. 4 Jana Doe 22 1a Deoabor -- and I think it nay have been the 14 De her 22 dace -- I'm not sure about that exact 13 la date -- but exhibits that were no

1,112 86:2 pages 36:12,20 38:11 42:19 51:18 53:20,22 painstaking 102:6 palatable 102:15 Palm 1:2,16,23,24 1:24 2:3,4,7,8,17 85:9 88:14 121:3 Pahnigiano 95:5 panel 118:6 panels 109:14 paper 36:17 83:20 papers 73:25 82:17 paragraph 103:10 103:11 106:8,9 paragraphs 27:9 paralegal 24:13 31:4 58:

question in front of you sight now is • very brief, representing three victims; LH, EM and • what to do about this. Well, we knee one thing. • Jane Doe. /Vat ono housekeeping natter. s lie know there's been absolutely no waiver of 10 No have riled a notion to intervene, which is 10 attorney/cl

1,112 86:2 pages 36:12,20 38:11 42:19 51:18 53:20,22 painstaking 102:6 palatable 102:15 Palm 1:2,16,23,24 1:24 2:3,4,7,8,17 85:9 88:14 121:3 Pahnigiano 95:5 panel 118:6 panels 109:14 paper 36:17 83:20 papers 73:25 82:17 paragraph 103:10 103:11 106:8,9 paragraphs 27:9 paralegal 24:13 31:4 58:

court in Doe'. Epstein, No. 9:08- cv-80I19-KAM (S.D. Fla.). Brunel's attorney asked counsel for Jane Doe to postpone the scheduled deposition date. Jane Doe's counsel agreed, and then Brunel's attorney cancelled the rescheduled deposition date. Brunel's counsel represented that Brunel was outside the count

evidence of the most persuasive character." United States ex rd. Biloktanskyl. Tod. 263 U.S. 149, 153-54 (1923) (Brandeis, J.), quoted in Baxter". Pahnigiano, 425 U.S 308, 319 (1976). And that silence takes on an even more sinister cast when combined with the fact that Epstein's sexual interest in young