Epstein Secrets

Question Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 18:11:02 +0000 Importance: Normal — What is the Government's view on all this? Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

for the filing of our brief while a contested (and, in our view, meritorious) jurisdictional issue is before the Court. In looking more carefully at the CA11 Local Rules, we notice that under the Rule 31-21(d), if the Court were to issue a jurisdictional question, that would stay the time for filing our brief for 30

s?) I'm assuming that the Government does not want to have a brief due while the jurisdictional issue is pending. Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 EFTA00208578 From: Jackie Perczek [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 8:03 AM To: Paul Cassell

for the filing of our brief while a contested (and, in our view, meritorious) jurisdictional issue is before the Court. In looking more carefully at the CA11 Local Rules, we notice that under the Rule 31-21(d), if the Court were to issue a jurisdictional question, that would stay the time for filing our brief for 30

D as Equivalent to Jurisdictional Question Dexter — What is the Government's view on all this? Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell for lane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Paul , „— CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all

for the filing of our brief while a contested (and, in our view, meritorious) jurisdictional issue is before the Court. In looking more carefully at the CA11 Local Rules, we notice that under the Rule 31-21(d), if the Court were to issue a jurisdictional question, that would stay the time for filing our brief for 30