Epstein Secrets

tline Response in Opposition 04/03/18 PVD [No Charge] Work on hearing binder re Farmer l e 's Motion to Show Cause, Edwards' Joinder, , E.W. and Jane Doe's Joinder and Motion to ervene 04/03/18 PVD [No Charge] Work on exhibit of comparison of privilege log for in camera inspection; work on Exhibit A

Camera Review; work on Exhibit A to same which compares 47 e-mails (proposed trial exhibit privilege log entries; work on Response to ., E.W. and Jane Doe's Joinder in bankruptcy Motion to Show Cause; work on Response to Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause; work on proposed Order Sealing disc and exh

der Directing Clerk to Seal Filings; prepare Notice of Cancellation of UMC hearing; meet with J. lanno re disc; work on Response to Farmer Jaffe's Motion for Order to Show Cause; work on Response to Intervenor's Joinder; work on schedule of hearings to submit to judge 7.80 1,755.00 04/05/18 KBR Prepare for and attend ca

/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake Cit UT 84112-0730 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M , E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for n, E.W. and Jane Doe 14

the Court's ruling, then Edwards, himself, violated it with the filing of his Motion for Sanctions citing the alleged statements and by filing his Motion for Order to Show Cause in the Bankruptcy Court. Not once has Epstein or his counsel violated this Court's rulings. Instead, Epstein made appropriate general statements ab

ff/Comter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Paul Cassell 383 S. University Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M, E.W. and Jane Doe Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., Suite 250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for M, E.W. and Jane Doe 14

the Court's ruling, then Edwards, himself, violated it with the filing of his Motion for Sanctions citing the alleged statements and by filing his Motion for Order to Show Cause in the Bankruptcy Court. In fact, the challenged statements are appropriate general statements about the nature of the documents and their impact o