Epstein Secrets

ge female plaintiff. To augment his concocted story, Rothstein invited D3 to his office to view the thirteen banker's boxes of actual case files in Jane Doe in order to demonstrate that the claims against Epstein were legitimate and that the evidence against Epstein was real. In particular, Rothstein cla

al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (hereinafter referenced as the "Razorback Complaint"), on behalf of some of the Ponzi Scheme investors. Upon reviewing the Razorback Complaint, I learned that the Razorback Complaint detailed the use of the Epstein Cases (i.e., the cases being litigated against me by Edwards) to defraud in

xpenses, deposition related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by_ysiu in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and is

Epstein was aware of this when Epstein filed suit against him. However, the allegations made by the Federal Government and the attorneys who filed the Razorback Complaint, the expenditures on improper pleadings, discovery and motion practice by Edwards in the cases he was litigating against Epstein while a Partner at

expenses, deposition related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and

Epstein was aware of this when Epstein filed suit against him. However, the allegations made by the Federal Government and the attorneys who filed the Razorback Complaint, the expenditures on improper pleadings, discovery and motion practice by Edwards in the cases he was litigating against Epstein while a Partner at

expenses, deposition related costs, expert costs, etc.) that were incurred by you in the representation of you and/or your law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and

hat Epstein was aware of this when Epstein filed suit against him. However, the allegations made by the Federal Government, the attorneys who filed the Razorback Complaint, the expenditures on improper pleadings, discovery and motion practice by Edwards in the cases he was litigating against Epstein while a Partner at