Epstein Secrets

im to survive the motion. See. egs, SJ Opp. at 12 ("far from supporting summary judgment for the defendant, the evidence overwhelmingly inclines in Jane Doe's favor") (see other examples Carroll Reply Dec1.1 6). Further bolstering Doe's claims in the underlying case is the fact that evidence of sexual abu

. The additional topics that Rush agrees may have been discussed with an investigator working with Doe's counsel which Rush has now recalled in his Supplementary Affidavit fl 2, 3, do not materially alter the contours of the issues before the Court with regard to waiver. But, in any event, with his recollecti

the Southern District of New York (the "Jane Doe Action"). 13. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "K" is a true and correct copy of Real Party In Interest Jane Doe's Response in Opposition to Motion of Daily News, L.P. to Quash Subpoenas, with exhibits, dated April 29, 2010, that was submitted in the Jane Doe Act

ith exhibits, dated April 29, 2010, that was submitted in the Jane Doe Action. 14. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "L" is a true and correct copy of the Supplementary Affidavit of George Rush, sworn to April 30, 2010, that was submitted in the Jane Doe Action. 15. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "M" is a true and corr

on her daughter's behalf and asked that P ; wee te ee mL “| the litigation be halted until her daughter turns 18. - The mother com- plained that Jane Doe’s father’ did not consult with her or their daughter before sting Epstein ‘for $50mil- Epstein lion. The lawsuit al- Accused of leges sexual assault,

es Sierra Leone Singapore Singapore Slovak Republic Slovak Republic Slovenia *™* Solomon Islands South. Africa South Africa South Korea Spain 3 Supplementary Spain 2"? Supplementary Spain Supplementary Spain ; Srilanka —* St. Christopher - Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent-Grenadines Suriname Suriname Swazil