Epstein Secrets

ay with Request for Expedited Consideration" and as grounds states: Introduction No legal standing or basis exists for non-parties, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, to "join" any appellate motion or action by Edwards.' The unnecessary intervention appearance below by E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe, while never reduce

, Respondents/Defendants. MOTION TO STRIKE UNAUTHORIZED AND INAPPROPRIATE "JOINDER" FILED BY NON-PARTIES Petitioner, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300, moves to strike the "Joinder by Victims in Edwards' Motion for Partial Relief from Stay with Request for Expedited Consideration"

owell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., #250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 [email protected] [email protected] Co-Counsel for Intervenors E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter- Defendant Jeffrey Epstein VIA U.S. MAIL Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT BRADLEY J. EDWARDS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL RELIEF FROM STAY Petitioner, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.300, responds in opposition to the Motion for Partial Relief from Stay filed by Respondent, Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards")', on March 1

cuments are subject to confidentiality provisions, which the federal court recognized and enforced when it permitted disclosure to the attorneys for Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 and to any other victims and their counsel, provided they not disclose the terms to anyone else. Disclosure violates a condition of t

GENCY MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER DENYING STAY OF DISCLOSURE OF FEDERAL NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM Petitioner, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(O, requests this Court review the order denying his Motion to Stay Disclosure of Federal Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum pen