Epstein Secrets

ANYS)" )is „cl F.,. el - - - Cc: "I Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:53:59 +0000 USANYS Yes, the Jane Doe is From: (USANYS) Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 17:52 To: (USANYS) (USANYS) ic ); , for sure — thanks and good point. •c > Cc: (USANYS) 1.S

63 (1st Dep't 1989) (holding that "state courts are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to co

C c: I II It I/ II It Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:51:57 +0000 I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclos

63 (1st Dep't 1989) (holding that "state courts are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to co

To: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) 4 Cc: (USANYS) ) (USANYS) dc ); Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests 1 take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a

63 (1st Dep't 1989) (holding that "state courts are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to co

PM To: Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) (USANYS) •ca; Cc: (USANYS) > Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is Maria Lacerda? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a

63 (1st Dep't 1989) (holding that "state courts are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to co

ated Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe isa? I had a little pause on handing out the GJ

63 (1st Dep't 1989) (holding that "state courts are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to co

020 5:52 PM To: (USANYS) (USANYS) dc ); (USANYS) Cc: < M> < Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests I take it we fully know that Jane Doe is I had a little pause on handing out the GJ subpoena, but since it's something previously disclosed to her, I can't see much of a problem disclos

63 (1st Dep't 1989) (holding that "state courts are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to co