Epstein Secrets

OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, Intervenors.' ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 RESPONSE TO EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS SEARCY DENNY SCAROLA BARNHART & SHIPLEY, P.A. 2139 Palm Bea

ber 2017 Motion to Continue] said, "We have heard the Court loud and clear, now we" — Link and Rockenbach — "are on the case, with support from the Gunster firm, and we will not allow the same type of conduct that transpired earlier, which the Court was critical of, [to] happen again." That pledge to

rs prior to the Court's deadline to disclose trial exhibits: (1) Exhibits from production in this case; (2) Public records related to El., 1., and Jane Doe; (3) Public records related to a 2015 case involving Edwards and Alan Dershowitz; (4) Publicly available information regarding Edwards on his law fi

ber 13, 2017, Plaintiff retained new trial counsel, who appeared in the case on November I, 2017. Plaintiff also retained a team of lawyers from the Gunster law firm as trial support. None of the things Plaintiff is asking for in this Motion is based on lack of manpower. Even using all of these resource

RE II Deoksbor 5th and nide it clear to all parties that 10 12 exhibits that. here net disclosed by the end of II For Non-Parties L.M., E.M. 4 Jana Doe 22 1a Deoabor -- and I think it nay have been the 14 De her 22 dace -- I'm not sure about that exact 13 la date -- but exhibits that were no

49:19 74:8 119:25 greatest 17:20 group 43:24 111:17 115:6,7,9 groups 6:19 grudge 89:15 guess 109:7 guessing 38:19 guilt 99:21 guilty 99:13 Gunster 63:6 guys 111:8 H Hafele 1:16 half 52:22 65:18 82:3 band 21:16 56:8 74:18 91:14 118:14 121:14 handed 7:18 43:17 51:12 94:25 handing 23:17

question in front of you sight now is • very brief, representing three victims; LH, EM and • what to do about this. Well, we knee one thing. • Jane Doe. /Vat ono housekeeping natter. s lie know there's been absolutely no waiver of 10 No have riled a notion to intervene, which is 10 attorney/cl

49:19 74:8 119:25 greatest 17:20 group 43:24 111:17 115:6,7,9 groups 6:19 grudge 89:15 guess 109:7 guessing 38:19 guilt 99:21 guilty 99:13 Gunster 63:6 guys 111:8 H Hafele 1:16 half 52:22 65:18 82:3 band 21:16 56:8 74:18 91:14 118:14 121:14 handed 7:18 43:17 51:12 94:25 handing 23:17

TRICT JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT individually, EDWARDS, L.M., E.W., Intervenors. ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. individually, and and JANE DOE, Respondents CASE NO. 4D18-0762 APPENDIX TO RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PAGE 1. Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 200

er 13, 2017, Plaintiff retained new trial counsel, who appeared in the case on November I, 2017. Plaintiff also retained a team of lawyers from the Gunster law firm as trial support. None of the things Plaintiff is asking for in this Motion is based on lack of manpower. Even using all of these resources

f then-minor girls in his Palm Beach mansion in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere. Several of these victims, including L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe," were represented by Farmer Jaffe attorney Bradley J. Edwards in their civil suits against Epstein. [DE 1120]. 2. Edwards filed the three sexual

Kara Rockenbach, and the currently unidentified attorneys that Mr. Link has represented are also working on this case on behalf of Epstein from the Gunster law firm. 7. Epstein will pay Fanner Jaffe reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses connected with Farmer Jaffe's efforts to determine the circumsta