Epstein Secrets

t between some federal policy or interest and the use of state law" is required before "judicial creation of a special federal rule [is] justified." O'Melveny, 512 U.S. at 87. While few courts have addressed the precise issue of whether leases to which the Government is a party are governed by general fed

d OFM by letter that he intended to exercise his right of first refusal and renew the lease. Epstein contends that in a telephone conference between Richard Massey of OFM and Jeffrey Schantz, Epstein's transaction counsel, on April 19, 1996, OFM orally consented to Epstein's request to sublet the Premises to F

t between some federal policy or interest and the use of state law" is required before "judicial creation of a special federal rule [is] justified." O'Melveny, 512 U.S. at 87. While few courts have addressed the precise issue of whether leases to which the Government is a party are governed by general fed

d OFM by letter that he intended to exercise his right of first refusal and renew the lease. Epstein contends that in a telephone conference between Richard Massey of OFM and Jeffrey Schantz, Epstein's transaction counsel, on April 19, 1996, OFM orally consented to Epstein's request to sublet the Premises to F

etween some federal policy or inter- est and the use of state law" is required before "judicial creation of a special federal rule (is) justified." O'Melveny, 512 U.S. at 87, 114 S.Ct. 2048. While few courts have addressed the precise issue of whether leases to which the Government is a party are gover

M by letter that he intended to exercise his right of first refusal and renew the lease. Epstein contends that in a telephone confer- ence between Richard Massey of OFM and EFTA00187393 Jeffrey Schantz, Epstein's transaction coun- sel, on April 19, 1996, OFM orally consented to Epstein's request to sublet