Epstein Secrets

initial decision, for rearguing matters already addressed by the court, or for raising arguments that could have been raised before but were not." Bostic v. AT&T of the V.I., 312 F.Supp. 2d 731, 733, 45 V.I. 553 (D.V.I. 2004). In its motion for reconsideration, North Shore made two arguments. First,

ptcy court's denial of an appellant's motion for reconsideration is generally reviewed for abuse of discretion. See generally Max's Seafood Cafe v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 673 (3d Cir. 1999). "However, to the extent that the denial of reconsideration is predicated on an issue of law, such an award is rev

al Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3 does not require an unequivocal finding of manifest injustice before the Court may alter or amend a prior order. See Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands, 45 V.I. 553, 312 F.Supp.2d 731 M. 2004). "...[R]econsideration is the appropriate means of bringing to the court's

consideration is the appropriate means of bringing to the court's attention manifest errors of fact or law." Max's Seafood Cara by Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 648 (3d Cir. 1999). The purpose of such motions is to allow the Court to correct errors, sparing parties and appellate courts the bur

al Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3 does not require an unequivocal finding of manifest injustice before the Court may alter or amend a prior order. See Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands, 45 V.I. 553, 312 F.Supp.2d 731 (D.C.V.I. 2004). "...[Rleconsideration is the appropriate means of bringing to the co

consideration is the appropriate means of bringing to the court's attention manifest errors of fact or law." Max's Seafood Café by Lou-Ann, Inc. v. Quinteros, 176 F.3d 669, 648 (3d Cir. 1999). The purpose of such motions is to allow the Court to correct errors, sparing parties and appellate courts the bur