Epstein Secrets

the Rules of the District Cowl, the Ocderal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence." ° Bostic v. AT&T ophe V.I., 312 F. Supp. 2d 731, 733 (D.V.I. 2004). 9 Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985). 1° F & M Distributors, In

ird party I Plaintiffs Jeffrey Epstein and L.S.J., LLC are represented by Denise Francois, Esq. Defendant Fancelli P eling, Inc., is represented by Treston E. Moore, Esq. 2 For a complete recitation of the factual and procedural history in this matter see this Court's May 1 2011 Memorandum Opinion. Epstein v.

al Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3 does not require an unequivocal finding of manifest injustice before the Court may alter or amend a prior order. See Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands, 45 V.I. 553, 312 F.Supp.2d 731 M. 2004). "...[R]econsideration is the appropriate means of bringing to the court's

ue and correct copy of the foregoing MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ECONSIDERATION OF ORDER ENTERED MAY 24, 2011 to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this r day of -1t.t , 201

al Rule of Civil Procedure 7.3 does not require an unequivocal finding of manifest injustice before the Court may alter or amend a prior order. See Bostic v. AT&T of the Virgin Islands, 45 V.I. 553, 312 F.Supp.2d 731 (D.C.V.I. 2004). "...[Rleconsideration is the appropriate means of bringing to the co

y of the foregoing MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT'S ORDER ENTERED ON MAY 24, 2011, to be served upon Treston E. Moore, Esquire, MOORE DODSON & RUSSELL, P. O. Box 310, St. Thomas, VI 00804 by first class U. S. Mail, postage prepaid on this Is day of tin rI•P ,