Epstein Secrets

matter In which this case 21 and Fourth District Court of Appeal but also by our 21 has bawl prepared by counsel for Kr. Epstein over 22 local Bar Association, or which many of you are 22 the last 3,000 and some odd day➢. I can, however, 22 prominent embers hese, so you know that caralument 22 speak t

some. They're exhibits that Mr. Edwards 3 directly from the Fourth Diatrict Court of Appeal, 4 has asked about and answered that are on this 4 RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it s privilege log. There's over a hundred of then. 5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate 4 So this disk is not a di➢k

matter In which this case 21 and Fourth District Court of Appeal but also by our 21 has bawl prepared by counsel for Kr. Epstein over 22 local Bar Association, or which many of you are 22 the last 3,000 and some odd day➢. I can, however, 22 prominent embers hese, so you know that caralument 22 speak t

some. They're exhibits that Mr. Edwards 3 directly from the Fourth Diatrict Court of Appeal, 4 has asked about and answered that are on this 4 RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it s privilege log. There's over a hundred of then. 5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate 4 So this disk is not a di➢k

to the natter in which this caaw • and Fourth District Court or Appeal but also by our is has been prepared by counsel for Kr. Epstein over local Bar Association, of which many of you aro prominent nenbers here, so you know that COCIAILTAAC 22 is the last 3,000 and sone odd days. I can, however, speak CO

e log. There's over a hundred of them. • presentation. I often refer to a case that I printed directly from the Fourth District Court of Appeal, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it talks about the trial judge's ultimate So this disk is not a disk of their privileged docunents. It's a disk of 27,500 doc