Epstein Secrets

matter In which this case 21 and Fourth District Court of Appeal but also by our 21 has bawl prepared by counsel for Kr. Epstein over 22 local Bar Association, or which many of you are 22 the last 3,000 and some odd day➢. I can, however, 22 prominent embers hese, so you know that caralument 22 speak t

e fourth thing i0 we want an order directing a gain knowledge that is likely residing at the S Mr. Epstein not to reveal the contents of this 9 Fouler White firm in scan form or fashion, whether 9 information to anyone. We are told that 10 lc be current or former employees or otherwise. So 10

matter In which this case 21 and Fourth District Court of Appeal but also by our 21 has bawl prepared by counsel for Kr. Epstein over 22 local Bar Association, or which many of you are 22 the last 3,000 and some odd day➢. I can, however, 22 prominent embers hese, so you know that caralument 22 speak t

e fourth thing i0 we want an order directing a gain knowledge that is likely residing at the S Mr. Epstein not to reveal the contents of this 9 Fouler White firm in scan form or fashion, whether 9 information to anyone. We are told that 10 lc be current or former employees or otherwise. So 10

to the natter in which this caaw • and Fourth District Court or Appeal but also by our is has been prepared by counsel for Kr. Epstein over local Bar Association, of which many of you aro prominent nenbers here, so you know that COCIAILTAAC 22 is the last 3,000 and sone odd days. I can, however, speak CO

the orderly disk Ln there. So what I'm suggesting is if we're I9 administration of justice and, correspondingly, the trying to figure out whether Fouler White violated 20 orderly preparation for trial. That preparation -- the order, I don't think it's as clear as 21 and you'll be surprised when it