Epstein Secrets

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

2020) 9 Neb. Press Ass 'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976) 4, 5 ii EFTA00105601 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 42 Filed 02/10/21 Page 4 of 15 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 2 Schiller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep'

2(bX7XC). Under Exemption 7(C), a court again "balance[s] the public interest in disclosure against the [privacy] interest." Associated Press v. US. Dep't of Defense,554 F.3d 274, 284 (2d Cir. 2009). In this analysis, "[t]here is only one relevant public interest, that of opening agency action to the li

nds of investigatory records .. . would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings." Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 236 (quotation marks omitted); Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The government need only demonstrate a "rational link" between the requested public disclosure and

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

2020) 9 Neb. Press Ass 'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976) 4, 5 ii EFTA00071611 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 42 Filed 02/10/21 Page 4 of 15 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 2 Schiller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep'

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

2020) 9 Neb. Press Ass 'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976) 4, 5 ii EFTA00088562 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 42 Filed 02/10/21 Page 4 of 15 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 2 Schiller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep'