Epstein Secrets

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

tuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of publicity. Neb. Press Ass 'n, 427 U.S. at 563-64 (enumerating methods to mitigate the effect of pre- trial publicity including: "change of [a trial] venue," "postponement of the

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

tuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of publicity. Neb. Press Ass 'n, 427 U.S. at 563-64 (enumerating methods to mitigate the effect of pre- trial publicity including: "change of [a trial] venue," "postponement of the

ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet

tuart, 427 U.S. 539, 565 (1976)). Nor is withholding the records the only measure that courts can use to mitigate the adverse effects of publicity. Neb. Press Ass 'n, 427 U.S. at 563-64 (enumerating methods to mitigate the effect of pre- trial publicity including: "change of [a trial] venue," "postponement of the