Epstein Secrets

losure latency, with victims being at higher risk for delayed dis- closure if there is a close relation with the assailant (Kogan. 2004: Koss 1988: Rickert, Wiemann, & Vaughan, 2005). In contrast, delayed disclosure is less common in victims of a stereotypical rape. i.e., rape by a stranger including a

ing disclosure. Evidence suggests that young children are at higher risk for delayed disclosure than adolescents (Kogan. 2004: SchOnbucher, Maier, Mohler-Kuo. Schnyder. & Landoll. 2012). Thus, various rape and victim-related character- istics have been found to be associated with timing of disclosure. T

osure latency, with victims being at higher risk for delayed dis- closure if there is a close relation with the assailant (Kogan, 2004; Koss, 1988; Rickert, Wiemann, & Vaughan, 2005). In contrast, delayed disclosure is less common in victims of a stereotypical rape, i.e., rape by a stranger including a

ectively report having experienced CSA, official incidence estimates indicate only 1 per 250 children. In a survey of Swiss child services, Maier, Mohler-Kuo, Landholt, Schnyder, and Jud (2013) fur- ther found 2.68 cases per 1,000 of CSA disclosures, while in a recent comprehensive review McElvaney (2015)

ectively report having experienced CSA, official incidence estimates indicate only 1 per 250 children. In a survey of Swiss child services, Maier, Mohler-Kuo, Landholt, Schnyder, and Jud (2013) fur- ther found 2.68 cases per 1,000 of CSA disclosures, while in a recent comprehensive review McElvaney (2015)

osure latency, with victims being at higher risk for delayed dis- closure if there is a close relation with the assailant (Kogan, 2004; Koss, 1988; Rickert, Wiemann, & Vaughan, 2005). In contrast, delayed disclosure is less common in victims of a stereotypical rape, i.e., rape by a stranger including a