Epstein Secrets

ngs on CSA d sc osure (continued) EFTA00088894 I-, Table I. (tom nued) P Study Purpose Des gn Samp e F nd ngs Summary A agg a (2010) Fontes and P ummer (2010) Ungar, Barter. McConne Tutty, and Fa rho m. (2009a) The study a med to dent fy factors mped ng or promot ng CSA d sc osure

xual abuse disclosures, and she is a researcher on the "Make Resilience Matter" project examining childhood exposure to domestic violence with Dr. Alaggia at the Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto. EFTA00088912 Child Abuse Review Vol. 24: 159-169 (2015) Published online

isclosure is being viewed as a dynamic, rather than static, process and described "not as a single event but rather a carefully measured process" (Alaggia, 2005, p. 455). The catalyst for this view originates from Summit (I 983) who initially conceptualized CSA disclo- sures as process based, although

tudy findings on CSA disclosure (continued) EFTA00156869 Table I. (continued) Study Purpose Design Sample Findings Summary Alauia (2010) Fontes and Plummer (2010) Ungar. Barter. McConnell. Tuay. and Faith*1m. (20092) The study aimed to identify factors impeding or promoting CA disclos

tered unsupportive responses which is high (continued) EFTA00156873 t4 Table I. (continued) Study Purpose Design Sample Findings Summary Alaggia and Kirshenbaum The objectives of the (2005) current study were to identify a broad range of factors. including family dynamics that contribut

(continued) EFTA00024181 --- PAGE BREAK --- I-, Table I. (coin nued) cr. P Study Purpose Des gn Samp e F nd ngs Summary A agg a (2010) Fontes and P ummer (2010) Ungar, Barter. McConne . Tutty, and Fa rho m. (2009a) The study a med to dent fy factors mped ng or promot ng CSA d sc osu

isclosure is being viewed as a dynamic, rather than static, process and described "not as a single event but rather a carefully measured process" (Alaggia, 2005, p. 455). The catalyst for this view originates from Summit (I 983) who initially conceptualized CSA disclo- sures as process based, although

ntly of intrapersonal factors of child victims, knowledge construction has shifted to fuller social— ecological, person-in-environment explanations (Alaggia, 2010; Collin-Vezina et al., 2015; Easton et al., 2014; Hunter, 2011; Ungar, Tutty, McConnell, Barter, & Fairholm, 2009b). Social-ecological expla