Epstein Secrets

disclose to. and what were their motives for disclosing Aim of this study was to develop a fuller understanding of CSA disclosures Schaeffer. Leventhal. and This study aimed to: (I) Asnes (2011) add direct inquiry about the process of a child's CSA disclosure: (2) determine if children will di

nterviews in U Flick. In E. von ICardorff & I. Steinke (Eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research (pp. 259-265). London. UK: Sage. Schaeffer. P., Leventhal, 1. M.. & Asnes. A. G. (2011). Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: Learning from direct inquiry. Child Abuse & Neglect• 35, 343-352. doi:10.101

tered unsupportive responses which is high (continued) EFTA00156873 t4 Table I. (continued) Study Purpose Design Sample Findings Summary Alaggia and Kirshenbaum The objectives of the (2005) current study were to identify a broad range of factors. including family dynamics that contribut

interviews in U Flick. In E. von Kardorff & I. Steinke (Eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research (pp. 259 265). London, UK: Sage. Schaeffer, P., Leventhal, J. M., & Asnes, A. G. (2011). Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: Learning from direct inquiry. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 343 352. doi:10.101

xual abuse disclosures, and she is a researcher on the "Make Resilience Matter" project examining childhood exposure to domestic violence with Dr. Alaggia at the Factor Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto. EFTA00088912 Child Abuse Review Vol. 24: 159-169 (2015) Published online

isclosure is being viewed as a dynamic, rather than static, process and described "not as a single event but rather a carefully measured process" (Alaggia, 2005, p. 455). The catalyst for this view originates from Summit (I 983) who initially conceptualized CSA disclo- sures as process based, although

isclosure is being viewed as a dynamic, rather than static, process and described "not as a single event but rather a carefully measured process" (Alaggia, 2005, p. 455). The catalyst for this view originates from Summit (I 983) who initially conceptualized CSA disclo- sures as process based, although

ntly of intrapersonal factors of child victims, knowledge construction has shifted to fuller social— ecological, person-in-environment explanations (Alaggia, 2010; Collin-Vezina et al., 2015; Easton et al., 2014; Hunter, 2011; Ungar, Tutty, McConnell, Barter, & Fairholm, 2009b). Social-ecological expla

interviews in U Flick. In E. von Kardorff & I. Steinke (Eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research (pp. 259 265). London, UK: Sage. Schaeffer, P., Leventhal, J. M., & Asnes, A. G. (2011). Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: Learning from direct inquiry. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 343 352. doi:10.101