5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
.N.Y. 2019) ("SEC"); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) ("PCAOB"); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("NYSE"). The Government does not ask the Court to rule on its view of itself and clearly this argument
(talking to or being nice to someone, or taking them to a movie), it is impossible to know what act or acts she needs to defend against at trial. The Discovery Provided to Date Contains No Corroborating Information and Omits Exculpatory Evidence At this point, roughly two months after the Government promised to produce the
.N.Y. 2019) ("SEC"); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) ("PCAOB"); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("NYSE"). The Government does not ask the Court to rule on its view of itself and clearly this argument
(talking to or being nice to someone, or taking them to a movie), it is impossible to know what act or acts she needs to defend against at trial. The Discovery Provided to Date Contains No Corroborating Information and Omits Exculpatory Evidence At this point, roughly two months after the Government promised to produce the
.N.Y. 2019) ("SEC"); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) ("PCAOB"); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("NYSE"). The Government does not ask the Court to rule on its view of itself and clearly this argument
(talking to or being nice to someone, or taking them to a movie), it is impossible to know what act or acts she needs to defend against at trial. The Discovery Provided to Date Contains No Corroborating Information and Omits Exculpatory Evidence At this point, roughly two months after the Government promised to produce the
.N.Y. 2019) ("SEC"); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) ("PCAOB"); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("NYSE"). The Government does not ask the Court to rule on its view of itself and clearly this argument
(talking to or being nice to someone, or taking them to a movie), it is impossible to know what act or acts she needs to defend against at trial. The Discovery Provided to Date Contains No Corroborating Information and Omits Exculpatory Evidence At this point, roughly two months after the Government promised to produce the
.N.Y. 2019) ("SEC"); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at *4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) ("PCAOB"); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("NYSE"). The Government does not ask the Court to rule on its view of itself and clearly this argument
(talking to or being nice to someone, or taking them to a movie), it is impossible to know what act or acts she needs to defend against at trial. The Discovery Provided to Date Contains No Corroborating Information and Omits Exculpatory Evidence At this point, roughly two months after the Government promised to produce the
Entities connected to both Finnerty and The Discovery Provided to Date

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Brady
PERSONCollins
PERSONMiddendorf
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON
Bagley
PERSON
Denver
LOCATION
Colorado
LOCATIONLumpkin
PERSONthe New York Stock Exchange
ORGANIZATION
Foreman
PERSONJeffrey Pagliuca
PERSON
New York
LOCATIONHaddon
PERSONthe Court the Government
ORGANIZATIONTeman
PERSON