Epstein Secrets

I agree that that wa➢ something 12 like Mr. Scarola -- 23 that the Court had a specific interest in and has 13 THE COURT: Excuse rm. Is Mr. Ackerman still 24 always taken the position that all cards are going 24 actively practicing? 25 to be on the table in a timely fashion ➢o that, 25 NR

mulated 85:6 accurate 99:4,10 accurately 67:4 accusations 27:7 30:15 96:12,14 accusatory 30:16 accuse 91:6 accused 7:11,13 68:3,4 86:25 88:1 Ackerman 8:1 35:23 36:1,1,2 56:23 Ackerman's 48:25 acknowledged 5:11 86:1 87:12 Act 16:1 acted 27:10 action 23:20 50:2 83:24 84:2,3 85:13 86:14 89:1

ding this. I Combine Investments versus Rothstein. 0 believe that prejudice outweighs any, any value it I Interestingly, a natter related to the Ponsi a might have, any relevance in this action, because , schma. 10 he needs co show damages proximately caused and not 10 And those two eases to

I agree that that wa➢ something 12 like Mr. Scarola -- 23 that the Court had a specific interest in and has 13 THE COURT: Excuse rm. Is Mr. Ackerman still 24 always taken the position that all cards are going 24 actively practicing? 25 to be on the table in a timely fashion ➢o that, 25 NR

mulated 85:6 accurate 99:4,10 accurately 67:4 accusations 27:7 30:15 96:12,14 accusatory 30:16 accuse 91:6 accused 7:11,13 68:3,4 86:25 88:1 Ackerman 8:1 35:23 36:1,1,2 56:23 Ackerman's 48:25 acknowledged 5:11 86:1 87:12 Act 16:1 acted 27:10 action 23:20 50:2 83:24 84:2,3 85:13 86:14 89:1

ding this. I Combine Investments versus Rothstein. 0 believe that prejudice outweighs any, any value it I Interestingly, a natter related to the Ponsi a might have, any relevance in this action, because , schma. 10 he needs co show damages proximately caused and not 10 And those two eases to

ll of when were involved at some point 21 In time in the representation of Jeffrey Epstein, 32 Correct? 33 A Yea. 24 Q I think I missed Mr. Ackerman on that list. 23 Mr. Ackerman as well. 136 I BY NE. SCAROLA: 2 Q Lot me restate the question. 3 what extent, if any, would it be necessary

9 accident 94:23 95:17 account 29:15 accountable 107:14 accounts 29:1,2,5 accurate 114:13 accused 46:23 151:9 accusing 50:11 achieved 122:3 Ackerman 90:18 134:24.25 135:1.2 acknowledge 56:24 acknowledged 135:6 acquainted 15:14 acquired 19:13 act 53:24 acted 136:5 acting 134:3 action 8:2

hree child victims? A No. Q Dld there coma a tine when you learned that Rothstein had used the cases that we have been referring to to attract Ponsi schema investor➢? A I learned that sometime in the beginning of November of 2009 by -- , by reading it in the paper. Q prior to that tine, w