Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
grossly negligent disregard for Fourth Amendment rights."' United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105, 117-18 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438, 443 (2d Cir. 2013)); see also United States v. Green, 981 F.3d 945, 957 (11th Cir. 2020) ("It follows that when officers act with `an
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature ofcell phone location records," which
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
grossly negligent disregard for Fourth Amendment rights."' United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105, 117-18 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438, 443 (2d Cir. 2013)); see also United States v. Green, 981 F.3d 945, 957 (11th Cir. 2020) ("It follows that when officers act with `an
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
grossly negligent disregard for Fourth Amendment rights."' United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105, 117-18 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438, 443 (2d Cir. 2013)); see also United States v. Green, 981 F.3d 945, 957 (11th Cir. 2020) ("It follows that when officers act with `an
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
grossly negligent disregard for Fourth Amendment rights."' United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105, 117-18 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438, 443 (2d Cir. 2013)); see also United States v. Green, 981 F.3d 945, 957 (11th Cir. 2020) ("It follows that when officers act with `an
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Stokes and the Carpenter Court
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON37 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION27 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
DB
Doug Band
PERSON24 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON22 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON21 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON21 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
Stephen Hawking
PERSON17 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
WE
Werner
PERSON17 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
AH
Ahmed
PERSON16 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
Michael Jackson
PERSON16 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON16 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON15 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
FI
Fisher
PERSON15 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON15 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
Carpenter
PERSON14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
Minnesota
LOCATION14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
SW
Sweet
PERSON14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ the