Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
grossly negligent disregard for Fourth Amendment rights."' United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105, 117-18 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438, 443 (2d Cir. 2013)); see also United States v. Green, 981 F.3d 945, 957 (11th Cir. 2020) ("It follows that when officers act with `an
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
grossly negligent disregard for Fourth Amendment rights."' United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105, 117-18 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438, 443 (2d Cir. 2013)); see also United States v. Green, 981 F.3d 945, 957 (11th Cir. 2020) ("It follows that when officers act with `an
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
grossly negligent disregard for Fourth Amendment rights."' United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105, 117-18 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438, 443 (2d Cir. 2013)); see also United States v. Green, 981 F.3d 945, 957 (11th Cir. 2020) ("It follows that when officers act with `an
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
grossly negligent disregard for Fourth Amendment rights."' United States v. Raymonda, 780 F.3d 105, 117-18 (2d Cir. 2015) (quoting United States v. Stokes, 733 F.3d 438, 443 (2d Cir. 2013)); see also United States v. Green, 981 F.3d 945, 957 (11th Cir. 2020) ("It follows that when officers act with `an
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (253)
Entities connected to both Stokes and Herring v. United States
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON37 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
United States
LOCATION27 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
DB
Doug Band
PERSON24 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON22 w/ Stokes·3 w/ Herring
Julie K. Brown
PERSON21 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON21 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
Stephen Hawking
PERSON17 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
WE
Werner
PERSON17 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
AH
Ahmed
PERSON16 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
Michael Jackson
PERSON16 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
Bill Richardson
PERSON16 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON15 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
FI
Fisher
PERSON15 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
George Mitchell
PERSON15 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
Carpenter
PERSON14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
Minnesota
LOCATION14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
SW
Sweet
PERSON14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
the Southern District
LOCATION14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON14 w/ Stokes·4 w/ Herring