Epstein Secrets

emory for a stressful event. In N. Stein, P. A. Ornstein, C. Brainerd, & B. Tversky (Eds.), Memory for emotional and everyday events (pp. 267-294). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Schwartz-Kenney, B., Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1996). Improving children's person identification. Child Maltreatment, 1, 121-

Sciences, I, 54-75. 23 3534-016 Page 21 of 70 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_000 10330 EFTA00159978 Qin, J. J., Tyda, K, Sr Goodman, G. S. (1997). Retractors' experiences: What we can and cannot conclude. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 312-316. Goodman, G. S., Qu

7). Imagery effects in spoken and written recall. In D. Payne & F. Conrad (This.), Intersections in basic and applied memory research (pp. 279-289). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Berresheim, A. & Weber, A. (2003). Die Strukturierte Zeugenvernehmung and Ihre Wirksamkeit [Structured witness interviewing and its

43-659. Boon, J. & Noon, E. (1994). Changing perspectives in cognition interviewing. Psychology, crime & Law, I, 59-69. Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, / 331-350. Brock, P., Fisher, R.P., & Cutler, B.L. (1999). Examining the cogniti

ve eyewitness memory. In M. Toglia, J. Reed , D. Ross, & R. Lindsay, & (Eds.) The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Volume One. Memory for events. Mahwah, N.J.:Erlbaum Associates. (pp.53-80) Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. P. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a sel

ugenvernehmung and Ihre Wirksamkeit [Structured witness interviewing and its effectiveness]. Kriminalistik, 57, 757-771. Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331-350. Ceci, S. J. & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scienti