Epstein Secrets

termination that any responsive records were exempt from disclosure, in full or in part, under FOIA Exemptions 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(E), and/or 7(F). Christenson DecL ¶ 7. 3 EFTA00071562 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 10 of 30 The Times subsequently sent BOP two additional FOIA req

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

termination that any responsive records were exempt from disclosure, in full or in part, under FOIA Exemptions 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(E), and/or 7(F). Christenson DecL ¶ 7. 3 EFTA00075445 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 10 of 30 The Times subsequently sent BOP two additional FOIA req

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

termination that any responsive records were exempt from disclosure, in full or in part, under FOIA Exemptions 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(E), and/or 7(F). Christenson DecL ¶ 7. 3 EFTA00088679 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 10 of 30 The Times subsequently sent BOP two additional FOIA req

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that