Epstein Secrets

applies a more practical approach, the documents at issue were still compiled for law enforcement purposes. See BOP MOL at 8-10. Specifically, the Christenson and Supplemental Christenson declarations explain how the records were compiled to help BOP take "proactive steps designed to prevent criminal activ

pp. 2d 37 (D.D.C. 2012) 14 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Kimberlin v. DOJ, 139 F.3d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1998) 13 Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Univ. v. U. S. Dep't of Homeland Security, 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 19 Kubik

termination that any responsive records were exempt from disclosure, in full or in part, under FOIA Exemptions 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(E), and/or 7(F). Christenson DecL ¶ 7. 3 EFTA00071562 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 10 of 30 The Times subsequently sent BOP two additional FOIA req

, 2 00 7) 15 National Archives & Records Administration v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (200 4) 19 Nat 7 Assoc. of Homebuilders v. Norton, 309 F.3d 26 (D.C. Cir. 2 002) 17 iii EFTA00071557 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 5 of 30 New York Tunes Co. v. Dep't o/•.Justice, No. 14 Ch,

termination that any responsive records were exempt from disclosure, in full or in part, under FOIA Exemptions 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(E), and/or 7(F). Christenson DecL ¶ 7. 3 EFTA00075445 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 10 of 30 The Times subsequently sent BOP two additional FOIA req

, 2 00 7) 15 National Archives & Records Administration v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (200 4) 19 Nat 7 Assoc. of Homebuilders v. Norton, 309 F.3d 26 (D.C. Cir. 2 002) 17 iii EFTA00075440 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 5 of 30 New York Tunes Co. v. Dep't o/•.Justice, No. 14 Ch,

applies a more practical approach, the documents at issue were still compiled for law enforcement purposes. See BOP MOL at 8-10. Specifically, the Christenson and Supplemental Christenson declarations explain how the records were compiled to help BOP take "proactive steps designed to prevent criminal activ

pp. 2d 37 (D.D.C. 2012) 14 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20 Kimberlin v. DOJ, 139 F.3d 944 (D.C. Cir. 1998) 13 Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Univ. v. U. S. Dep't of Homeland Security, 407 F. Supp. 3d 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 19 Kubik

termination that any responsive records were exempt from disclosure, in full or in part, under FOIA Exemptions 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(E), and/or 7(F). Christenson DecL ¶ 7. 3 EFTA00088679 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 10 of 30 The Times subsequently sent BOP two additional FOIA req

, 2 00 7) 15 National Archives & Records Administration v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (200 4) 19 Nat 7 Assoc. of Homebuilders v. Norton, 309 F.3d 26 (D.C. Cir. 2 002) 17 iii EFTA00088674 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 5 of 30 New York Tunes Co. v. Dep't o/•.Justice, No. 14 Ch,