Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
782 F. Supp. 628 (D.D.C. 1991) 19 NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck, 421 U.S. 132 (1975) 13 North v. Walsh, 881 F.2d 1088 (D.C. Cir. 1989) 8 Oglesby v. U.S. Army, 920 F.2d 57 (D.C. Cir. 1990) 5 Pinson v. Dept of .htstice, 236 F. Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2017) 22 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2
st be either pending or reasonably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the gov
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
782 F. Supp. 628 (D.D.C. 1991) 19 NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck, 421 U.S. 132 (1975) 13 North v. Walsh, 881 F.2d 1088 (D.C. Cir. 1989) 8 Oglesby v. U.S. Army, 920 F.2d 57 (D.C. Cir. 1990) 5 Pinson v. Dept of .htstice, 236 F. Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2017) 22 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2
st be either pending or reasonably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the gov
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
782 F. Supp. 628 (D.D.C. 1991) 19 NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck, 421 U.S. 132 (1975) 13 North v. Walsh, 881 F.2d 1088 (D.C. Cir. 1989) 8 Oglesby v. U.S. Army, 920 F.2d 57 (D.C. Cir. 1990) 5 Pinson v. Dept of .htstice, 236 F. Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2017) 22 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2
st be either pending or reasonably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the gov
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (131)
Entities connected to both U.S. Army and N.L.R.B. v.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON40 w/ U.S.·5 w/ N.L.R.B.
United States
LOCATION28 w/ U.S.·4 w/ N.L.R.B.
George W. Bush
PERSON27 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION23 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Paul Ryan
PERSON12 w/ U.S.·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
The Washington Post
ORGANIZATION11 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Andrew Cuomo
PERSON11 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
CO
Collins
PERSON11 w/ U.S.·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
National Intelligence
ORGANIZATION10 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
PE
Perez
PERSON10 w/ U.S.·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
CA
Carney
PERSON9 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
The New York Times
ORGANIZATION9 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
FBI
ORGANIZATION10 w/ U.S.·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
CH
Christenson
PERSON8 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Federal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATION9 w/ U.S.·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
GA
Garcia
PERSON8 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON8 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
the Southern District
LOCATION8 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.
Ronald Reagan
PERSON8 w/ U.S.·2 w/ N.L.R.B.
SH
Shapiro
PERSON7 w/ U.S.·3 w/ N.L.R.B.