Epstein Secrets

the case of Edward Redstone v. Commissioned. While the Tax Court agreed with Edward, it disagreed in a later decision involving Edward's brother, Sumner - arguments about similar facts, but with a haunting twist of beyond the grave revenge. Backgrounda In the mid 1960s, Edward owned a one-third int

EFTA00668065 However, at Sumner's trial, the Tax Court stated, There is no evidence that any dispute existed in 1971-1972 concerning ownership of Sumner's stock or that Mickey was determined to withhold any of Sumner's shares from him. To the contrary: the evidence showed that Mickey and Sumner were

Brother's Revenge) (Sumner Redstone v. Commissioner ra By Lance S. Hall, ASA! A few weeks ago, the Tax Court released its decision in the case of Edward Redstone v. Commissioned. While the Tax Court agreed with Edward, it disagreed in a later decision involving Edward's brother, Sumner - arguments about sim

ermined in the Final Decree. In regards to any penalties for not declaring a gift, participants from the firm that provided accounting services for Sumner and NAI some 40 plus years ago, testified about uncertain memories and vague discussions with now deceased partners. A key memory, however, was the

ng FMV Opinions, Inc. can be accessed at www.fmv,com. 2 145 T.C. No. I I (October 26, 2015) 3 This section comes from my prior article regarding the Edward Redstone v. Commissioner case 4 Today, NAI is the owner of many companies, including Viacom, and is run by Edward's brother, Sumner O'Connor V Redstone - 89

he case of Edward Redstone v. Commissionerill. While the Tax Court agreed with Edward, it disagreed in a later decision involving Edward's brother, Sumner - arguments about similar facts, but with a haunting twist of beyond the grave revenge. Background' In the mid 1960s, Edward owned a one-third int

d Brother's Revenge) (Sumner Redstone v. Commissioner LW By Lance S. Hall, ASA* A few weeks ago, the Tax Court released its decision in the case of Edward Redstone v. Commissionerill. While the Tax Court agreed with Edward, it disagreed in a later decision involving Edward's brother, Sumner - arguments about s