Epstein Secrets

eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire

courts placed emphasis on the public interest in ensuring that extradition arrangements were honoured and in ensuring that serious allegations were tried63. 31. As to oppression, the graver the offence the higher the threshold for oppression". Given the seriousness of the offences in Ms Maxwell's case,

eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire

courts placed emphasis on the public interest in ensuring that extradition arrangements were honoured and in ensuring that serious allegations were tried63. 31. As to oppression, the graver the offence the higher the threshold for oppression". Given the seriousness of the offences in Ms Maxwell's case,

eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire

courts placed emphasis on the public interest in ensuring that extradition arrangements were honoured and in ensuring that serious allegations were tried63. 31. As to oppression, the graver the offence the higher the threshold for oppression". Given the seriousness of the offences in Ms Maxwell's case,