Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire
r family hardship that might be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public "Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition Act 2003, s. 81. 62 Extradition Act 2003, s. 82. The date range fo
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire
r family hardship that might be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public "Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition Act 2003, s. 81. 62 Extradition Act 2003, s. 82. The date range fo
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire
r family hardship that might be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public "Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition Act 2003, s. 81. 62 Extradition Act 2003, s. 82. The date range fo
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00011201
family hardship that might be caused by the extradition65 should outweigh the public 59 Ahmad v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR SE6, para. 105. 60 R (Bermingham) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2007] QB 727, para. 100. 61 Extradition Act 2003, s. 81. 62 Extradition Act 2003, s. 82. The date range fo
Page: EFTA00011201 →Page EFTA00011212
eedings. • Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16, [2008] 1 AC 920: Represented the Government of the United States in the House of Lords in the leading case on cartels and competition law, and the requirement of double criminality in extradition proceedings. • R (Bermingham) v Dire
Page: EFTA00011212 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (90)
Entities connected to both the House of Lords and Bermingham
United States
LOCATION6 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON6 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
Northern Ireland
LOCATION5 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
SA
Sanchez
PERSON5 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
High Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
Michael Cohen
PERSON5 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
MC
Mark S. Cohen
PERSON4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
AH
Ahmad
PERSON4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
Blackstone
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
Russia
LOCATION4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
the Cayman Islands
LOCATION4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
Henderson
LOCATION4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
Christian R. Everdell
PERSON4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
the Serious Fraud Office
ORGANIZATION4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
AD
Adeagbo
PERSON4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
KA
Kakis
PERSON4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
DE
Dewani
PERSON4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
HA
Hafeez
PERSON4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham
OT
Othman
PERSON4 w/ the·4 w/ Bermingham