Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(paras 102 and 106.108). The decision in Love was based on section 91 of the 2003 Act, and the court made no finding under Article 3 (para 123). In Hafeez, which was decided in January 2020, the High Court received the same evidence as has been before the court in Love, and concluded that "the evidence
illness (and associated suicide prevention) and they form an important part of extradition law". 94 Ahmad v United Kingdom 51 EHRR SE6, para. 133. Othman v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR I, para. 258. 96 Othman, para. 260. 99 R (on the application of HH) v Westminster Ciry Magistrates' Court [2013] 1
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(paras 102 and 106.108). The decision in Love was based on section 91 of the 2003 Act, and the court made no finding under Article 3 (para 123). In Hafeez, which was decided in January 2020, the High Court received the same evidence as has been before the court in Love, and concluded that "the evidence
illness (and associated suicide prevention) and they form an important part of extradition law". 94 Ahmad v United Kingdom 51 EHRR SE6, para. 133. Othman v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR I, para. 258. 96 Othman, para. 260. 99 R (on the application of HH) v Westminster Ciry Magistrates' Court [2013] 1
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(paras 102 and 106.108). The decision in Love was based on section 91 of the 2003 Act, and the court made no finding under Article 3 (para 123). In Hafeez, which was decided in January 2020, the High Court received the same evidence as has been before the court in Love, and concluded that "the evidence
illness (and associated suicide prevention) and they form an important part of extradition law". 94 Ahmad v United Kingdom 51 EHRR SE6, para. 133. Othman v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR I, para. 258. 96 Othman, para. 260. 99 R (on the application of HH) v Westminster Ciry Magistrates' Court [2013] 1
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00011205
"the evidence in this case falls well short of the necessary, threshold" to prove a breach of Article 3 based on the conditions at MDC and MCC (see Hafeez v Government of the United States of America [2020] EWHC 155 (Admin), pan. 66). 1922623.1 12 EFTA00011204 --- PAGE BREAK --- specific concerns,
Page: EFTA00011205 →Page EFTA00011206
ness (and associated suicide prevention) and they form an important part of extradition law". 94 Ahmad v United Kingdom 51 EHRR SE6, para. 133. 95 Othman v United Kingdom (2012) 55 EHRR I, pan. 258. 96 Othman para. 260. 99 R (on the application of HH) v Westminster City Magistrates' Court [2013] I AC
Page: EFTA00011206 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (90)
Entities connected to both Hafeez and Othman
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON6 w/ Hafeez·5 w/ Othman
Russia
LOCATION5 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
United States
LOCATION5 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
SA
Sanchez
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
Northern Ireland
LOCATION4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
AH
Ahmad
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
MC
Mark S. Cohen
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
Michael Cohen
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
Blackstone
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
the Cayman Islands
LOCATION4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
Henderson
LOCATION4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
Christian R. Everdell
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
the Serious Fraud Office
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
AD
Adeagbo
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
KA
Kakis
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
DE
Dewani
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
SB
Scott Baker
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
AD
Anand Doobay
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman
BD
Brian Dempsey
PERSON4 w/ Hafeez·4 w/ Othman