Epstein Secrets

ority of the harm caused by the offending75 alleged in the superseding indictment occurred in the United States. An extradition judge would treat 66 Kakis at 784. Although the passage of time bar was successfully relied on in the US extradition case of Eason v Government of the United States of America

n proceedings. The specific questions asked by Peters and Peters are attached at Annex A. A summary of counsel's relevant experience is attached at Annex B. The waiver is attached at Annex C. 2. In summary: (a) Extradition proceedings in the United Kingdom are governed by the Extradition Act 2003 One 2

ority of the harm caused by the offending75 alleged in the superseding indictment occurred in the United States. An extradition judge would treat 66 Kakis at 784. Although the passage of time bar was successfully relied on in the US extradition case of Eason v Government of the United States of America

n proceedings. The specific questions asked by Peters and Peters are attached at Annex A. A summary of counsel's relevant experience is attached at Annex B. The waiver is attached at Annex C. 2. In summary: (a) Extradition proceedings in the United Kingdom are governed by the Extradition Act 2003 One 2

ority of the harm caused by the offending75 alleged in the superseding indictment occurred in the United States. An extradition judge would treat 66 Kakis at 784. Although the passage of time bar was successfully relied on in the US extradition case of Eason v Government of the United States of America

n proceedings. The specific questions asked by Peters and Peters are attached at Annex A. A summary of counsel's relevant experience is attached at Annex B. The waiver is attached at Annex C. 2. In summary: (a) Extradition proceedings in the United Kingdom are governed by the Extradition Act 2003 One 2