Epstein Secrets

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 'INDICTMENT (18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1591(a), (b) (2), and 2) GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorne • 19 EFTA00164641 EXHIBIT B EFTA00164642 Date and time issued: A093 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Seizure Warturit UN

Epstein." 13. After observing the foregoing items, the Search Team stopped the search and froze the scene in order to seek a new search warrant. M. Conclusion and Ancillary Provisions 14. Based on the foregoing, given that several items described by Victim-1 as being present in the Subject Premises in 2005 appear to be currently

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. 'INDICTMENT (18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1591(a), (b) (2), and 2) GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney Forepe on 14 EFTA00164792 EXHIBIT B EFTA00164793 Date and time issued: A093 (SDNY Rev. 01/17) Search and Seizure War

Epstein." 13. After observing the foregoing items, the Search Team stopped the search and froze the scene in order to seek a new search warrant. M. Conclusion and Ancillary Provisions 14. Based on the foregoing, given that several items described by Victim-1 as being present in the Subject Premises in 2005 appear to be currently

e 18, United States Code, Section 1594; Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p); and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461.) EU EPERSON GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney 1.3 EFTA01648845 Form No. USA-33s-274 (Ed. 9-25-58) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED

Epstein." 13. After observing the foregoing items, the Search Team stopped the search and froze the scene in order to seek a new search warrant. M. Conclusion and Ancillary Provisions 14. Based on the foregoing, given that several items described by Victim-1 as being present in the Subject Premises in 2005 appear to be currently