Epstein Secrets

e of a subset of the withheld records that discuss or refer to Tartaglione (the "Tartaglione Records") would also interfere with the prosecution of Tartaglione. The Tartaglione Records contain information about Tartaglione's conditions of confinement and his interactions with Epstein, which have been put di

Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summary Judgment Standard 4 II. BOP Conducted an Adequate Sear

taglione Records could reasonably be expected to influence witness testimony and potential juror perceptions of any interactions between Epstein and Tartaglione. See Capone Decl ¶¶ 29-31. These explanations similarly "allow the court to trace a rational link between the nature of the document and the allege

on of the law." Exemption 7(E) contains "two alternative clauses," one covering "techniques and procedures," and the other addressing "guidelines." Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep 't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 680-81 (2d Cir. 2010). The first clause of Exemption 7(E) provides categorical

e of a subset of the withheld records that discuss or refer to Tartaglione (the "Tartaglione Records") would also interfere with the prosecution of Tartaglione. The Tartaglione Records contain information about Tartaglione's conditions of confinement and his interactions with Epstein, which have been put di

Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summary Judgment Standard 4 II. BOP Conducted an Adequate Sear

taglione Records could reasonably be expected to influence witness testimony and potential juror perceptions of any interactions between Epstein and Tartaglione. See Capone Decl ¶¶ 29-31. These explanations similarly "allow the court to trace a rational link between the nature of the document and the allege

on of the law." Exemption 7(E) contains "two alternative clauses," one covering "techniques and procedures," and the other addressing "guidelines." Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep 't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 680-81 (2d Cir. 2010). The first clause of Exemption 7(E) provides categorical

e of a subset of the withheld records that discuss or refer to Tartaglione (the "Tartaglione Records") would also interfere with the prosecution of Tartaglione. The Tartaglione Records contain information about Tartaglione's conditions of confinement and his interactions with Epstein, which have been put di

Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summary Judgment Standard 4 II. BOP Conducted an Adequate Sear

taglione Records could reasonably be expected to influence witness testimony and potential juror perceptions of any interactions between Epstein and Tartaglione. See Capone Decl ¶¶ 29-31. These explanations similarly "allow the court to trace a rational link between the nature of the document and the allege

on of the law." Exemption 7(E) contains "two alternative clauses," one covering "techniques and procedures," and the other addressing "guidelines." Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep 't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 680-81 (2d Cir. 2010). The first clause of Exemption 7(E) provides categorical

withheld Returned Records relates to the circumstances of Epstein's apparent suicide attempt and could reasonably be expected to interfere with the Tartaglione prosecution. See id. ¶¶ 15-16. B. Withholding of Some Returned Records in Full or in Part Pursuant to Exemption 6 and 7(C) Each of the Returned R

elease of the Tartaglione Records could reasonably be expected to interfere with any potential penalty-phase hearing required by 18 U.S.C. § 3593 in Tartaglione. Second, plaintiff mischaracterizes the Government's legitimate and reasonable concern about interference with any potential penalty phase of Tarta

dure' is `a particular way of doing or going about the accomplishment of something.'" ACLU v. DHS, 243 F. Supp. 3d 393, 402 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (quoting Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 682 (2d Cir. 2010)); see NYCLU v. DHS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289, 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

withheld Returned Records relates to the circumstances of Epstein's apparent suicide attempt and could reasonably be expected to interfere with the Tartaglione prosecution. See id. ¶¶ 15-16. B. Withholding of Some Returned Records in Full or in Part Pursuant to Exemption 6 and 7(C) Each of the Returned R

elease of the Tartaglione Records could reasonably be expected to interfere with any potential penalty-phase hearing required by 18 U.S.C. § 3593 in Tartaglione. Second, plaintiff mischaracterizes the Government's legitimate and reasonable concern about interference with any potential penalty phase of Tarta

dure' is `a particular way of doing or going about the accomplishment of something.'" ACLU v. DHS, 243 F. Supp. 3d 393, 402 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (quoting Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 682 (2d Cir. 2010)); see NYCLU v. DHS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289, 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)

withheld Returned Records relates to the circumstances of Epstein's apparent suicide attempt and could reasonably be expected to interfere with the Tartaglione prosecution. See id. ¶¶ 15-16. B. Withholding of Some Returned Records in Full or in Part Pursuant to Exemption 6 and 7(C) Each of the Returned R

elease of the Tartaglione Records could reasonably be expected to interfere with any potential penalty-phase hearing required by 18 U.S.C. § 3593 in Tartaglione. Second, plaintiff mischaracterizes the Government's legitimate and reasonable concern about interference with any potential penalty phase of Tarta

edure' is `a particular way of doing or going about the accomplishment of something." ACLU v. DHS, 243 F. Supp. 3d 393, 402 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (quoting Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 682 (2d Cir. 2010)); see NYCLU v. DHS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289, 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)