Epstein Secrets

OIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") properly withheld these records, and plaintiff's arguments to the contrary ignore or mischaracterize the weighty law enforcement interests a

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t

OIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") properly withheld these records, and plaintiff's arguments to the contrary ignore or mischaracterize the weighty law enforcement interests a

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t

OIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") properly withheld these records, and plaintiff's arguments to the contrary ignore or mischaracterize the weighty law enforcement interests a

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t