Epstein Secrets

OIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") properly withheld these records, and plaintiff's arguments to the contrary ignore or mischaracterize the weighty law enforcement interests a

lized. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶ 16. These prior versions of the ultimate response document were properly withheld under Exemption 5 as drafts. See American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126, 133 (2d Cir. 2016); Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ("It is well- settled that

OIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") properly withheld these records, and plaintiff's arguments to the contrary ignore or mischaracterize the weighty law enforcement interests a

lized. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶ 16. These prior versions of the ultimate response document were properly withheld under Exemption 5 as drafts. See American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126, 133 (2d Cir. 2016); Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ("It is well- settled that

OIA Exemption 7(A)—records that could reasonably be expected to interfere with two pending federal criminal prosecutions, one a death penalty case. The Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") properly withheld these records, and plaintiff's arguments to the contrary ignore or mischaracterize the weighty law enforcement interests a

it was finalized. See Supp. Decl. ¶ 16. These prior versions of the ultimate response document were properly withheld under Exemption 5 as drafts. See American Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't ofJustice, 844 F.3d 126, 133 (2d Cir. 2016); Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) ("It is well- settled that