Epstein Secrets

ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h

s the privacy interest of Epstein's brother in not having details and images of his brother's corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize surviving family members' interests in avoiding t

ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h

s the privacy interest of Epstein's brother in not having details and images of his brother's corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize surviving family members' interests in avoiding t

ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h

s the privacy interest of Epstein's brother in not having details and images of his brother's corpse publicly released. This position is contrary to Nat'l Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157, 165-71 (2004), and lower court decisions that expressly recognize surviving family members' interests in avoiding t