Epstein Secrets

de information due to its representation of one of Epstein's alleged victims in a civil case styled Jane Doe v. Jefrey Epstein, currently pending in the Southern District of Florida. Representatives of D3 were offered "the opportunity" to invest in a pre-suit, $30,000,000.00, court settlement against Epstein arising

on Income Fund. 18. Plaintiff, DEAN KRETSCHMAR (hereinafter, "Kretschmar"), is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida. On June 3, 2009, Kretschmar invested $8,000,000.00 into the Ponzi scheme through Banyon Income Fund. Page 10 of 2210 CONRAD & SCHERER, LLP, 633 SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, FORT LA

the Ponzi scheme through Banyon USVI, LLC. Von Allmen Dynasty Trust, D&L Partners, David Von Allmen Living Trust, Ann Von Allmen Living Trust, and Kretschmar were also major investors in Razorback. 12. Plaintiff, D3 CAPITAL CLUB, LLC (hereinafter, "D3"), is a Delaware limited liability company with its

client L.M., filed a two hundred and thirty four (234) page, one hundred fifty-six (156) count complaint against Epstein in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida styled L.M. v Epstein, Case Number 09-CIV- 81092. However, Edwards was never served. The case was filed with a misspelling of Epstein's -

ught in the case files for the Epstein Actions, which numbered as many as nineteen (19) boxes. 16. On or about October 13, 2009, Dean Kretschmar ("Kretschmar"), a representative of one of the investor groups, was encouraged by Rothstein, in a meeting with other partners of RRA, to look at the Epstein cas

nt was not made soon he would lose the client group to other lawyers. d) During this same time frame, specifically on or around October 13, 2009, Kretschmar and Legamaro of the investor group were shown by Rothstein the actual case files of RRA in the Epstein Actions. The Epstein files were brought to th

client L.M., filed a two hundred and thirty four (234) page, one hundred fifty-six (156) count complaint against Epstein in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida styled L.M. v Epstein, Case Number 09-CIV- 81092. However, Edwards was never served. The case was filed with a misspelling of Epstein's l

4215 Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Second Amended Complaint 16. On or about October 13, 2009, Dean Kretschmar ("Kretschmar"), a representative of one of the investor groups, was encouraged by Rothstein, in a meeting with other partners of RRA, to look at the Epstein cas

nt was not made soon he would lose the client group to other lawyers. d) During this same time frame, specifically on or around October 13, 2009, Kretschmar and Legamaro of the investor group were shown by Rothstein the actual case files of RRA in the Epstein Actions. The Epstein files were brought to th