Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment. In the fall of 2007, the Defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the Southern District of Florida in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment. In the fall of 2007, the Defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the Southern District of Florida in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment. In the fall of 2007, the Defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the Southern District of Florida in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment. In the fall of 2007, the Defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the Southern District of Florida in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (88)
Entities connected to both the Southern District and Interstate Facilities
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON2,140 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
United States
LOCATION1,096 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION982 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
Bradley Edwards
PERSON614 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
New York
LOCATION461 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION384 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
Julie K. Brown
PERSON242 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION199 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
Palm Beach
LOCATION187 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
George Mitchell
PERSON164 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
Michael Jackson
PERSON158 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
David Boies
PERSON147 w/ the·3 w/ Interstate
New York City
LOCATION130 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
United Kingdom
LOCATION99 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
New York State
LOCATION81 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
James Baker
PERSON72 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
Oliver Stone
PERSON70 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
New Mexico
LOCATION67 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
The Palm Beach Post
ORGANIZATION65 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate
The New York Post
ORGANIZATION65 w/ the·4 w/ Interstate