Epstein Secrets

LIST OF EXHIBITS - CHAPTER 4 1. Indictment filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Jefferey Epstein, dated July 2, 2019 (previously exhibited in Introduction). 2. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Psychological R

(BOP) Psychological Reconstruction dated September 17, 2019, regarding inmate Jeffrey Epstein (previously exhibited in Introduction). 3. BOP After Action Review, Inmate Suicide, Metropolitan Correctional Center, New York, NY, dated August 10, 2019. 4. U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, Crim

ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h

Housing Unit, sources typically relied upon and information-gathering steps taken in investigating incidents at the MCC, details about how BOP After Action Review teams conduct their work, and information about where evidence is stored. See Supp. Christenson Decl. q¶ 18- 25; see also, e.g., Human Rights Watch,

ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h

Housing Unit, sources typically relied upon and information-gathering steps taken in investigating incidents at the MCC, details about how BOP After Action Review teams conduct their work, and information about where evidence is stored. See Supp. Christenson Decl. q¶ 18- 25; see also, e.g., Human Rights Watch,

ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h

Housing Unit, sources typically relied upon and information-gathering steps taken in investigating incidents at the MCC, details about how BOP After Action Review teams conduct their work, and information about where evidence is stored. See Supp. Decl. 11118- 25; see also, e.g., Human Rights Watch, 2015 WL 54

ing BOP records. The charges were later dismissed after they successfully fulfilled deferred prosecution agreements. The U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York declined prosecution for other MCC New York employees who the OIG found created false documentation. The combination of these and othe

that Epstein attempted to "bring his attorneys into the fray regarding the mental hearth treatment being provided by the institution." In the After Action Review, the Southeast Regional Director wrote that it was not typical for the BOP to provide psychological intervention in the presence of others, nor was

ng BOP records. The charges were later dismissed after they successfully fulfilled deferred prosecution agreements. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York declined prosecution for other MCC New York employees who the OIG found created false documentation. The combination of these and othe

that Epstein attempted to "bring his attorneys into the fray regarding the mental health treatment being provided by the institution." In the After Action Review, the Southeast Regional Director wrote that it was not typical for the BOP to provide psychological intervention in the presence of others, nor was

BOP records. The charges were later dismissed after they successfully fulfilled deferred prosecution agreements. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York declined prosecution for other MCC New York employees who the OIG found created false documentation. The combination of these and othe

eport that there was no need for follow-up and that Epstein would be seen in the SHU for rounds and monthly SHU reviews. According to the BOP After Action Review submitted by the Southeast Regional Director, the Chief Psychologist’s meeting with Epstein on July 16, 2019, at Epstein’s request during his attorn

ing BOP records. The charges were later dismissed after they successfully fulfilled deferred prosecution agreements. The U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of New York declined prosecution for other MCC New York employees who the OIG found created false documentation. The combination of these and othe

that Epstein attempted to "bring his attorneys into the fray regarding the mental hearth treatment being provided by the institution." In the After Action Review, the Southeast Regional Director wrote that it was not typical for the BOP to provide psychological intervention in the presence of others, nor was