Epstein Secrets

be proper in the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of New York, New York or, to the extent permitted by law, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to or connected with this Agreement o

s or Limited. U5909125/6+ Page 7 EFTA00300191 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Payment of Deferred Consideration Pursuant to the Proof of Claim filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on January 11, 2008, Limited has filed a proof of claim in respect of contingent, unliquidated claims (if any) (collec

kers boxes which Rothstein used to bolster his concocted story in connection with the case styled Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, currently pending in the Southern District of Florida, when meeting with D3 representatives and/or any other potential Investors in order to induce those representatives invest in the Rothst

s H. Lichtman, Esq., Berger Singerman, P.A. 350 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1000 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 [ ] YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United States Bankruptcy Court at the place, date and time specified below to testify in the above case. PLACE OF TESTIMONY COURTROOM DATE AND TIME [ X YOU ARE COMMANDED to a

r Epstein complied with that directive is squarely and appropriately before the court that issued the Order — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. 2See March 8, 2018, Afternoon Hearing Transcript, 62:6-12 (Court allowed Epstein to file the exhibits under seal to protect his appell

ers. Whether or not Fowler White and/or Epstein complied with that directive is squarely and appropriately before the court that issued the Order — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. 2See March 8, 2018, Afternoon Hearing Transcript, 62:6-12 (Court allowed Epstein to file the exhibits under

trike, which identified a Federal Court Order issued on November 30, 2010 by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, prohibiting Epstein's prior counsel, Fowler White, from creating or retaining the CD in question, and reserving 3 EFTA00811313 Edwar

filed his Supplement to the Motion to Strike, which identified a Federal Court Order issued on November 30, 2010 by the Honorable Raymond B. Ray of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, prohibiting Epstein's prior counsel, Fowler White, from creating or retaining the CD in question, and reservin

potential acquisition in this prospectus as the "A&P Transaction." The MP Transaction received approval from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York on September 21.2015 and the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act terminated on September 15, 2015. We

from available cash. We refer to this potential acquisition in this prospectus as the "A&P Transaction." The MP Transaction received approval from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York on September 21.2015 and the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act terminated

morializing the agreement. It never did. Instead, Epstein decided to launch litigation in yet another forum — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. On July 14, 2010, Epstein filed a Motion to Compel production of numerous documents from Trustee Stettin in the bankruptcy proceeding b

tein was to prepare a consent order memorializing the agreement. It never did. Instead, Epstein decided to launch litigation in yet another forum — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. On July 14, 2010, Epstein filed a Motion to Compel production of numerous documents from Trustee Stettin in t

be proper in the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of New York, New York or, to the extent permitted by law, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to or connected with this Agreement o

liabilities or condition of Holdings or Limited. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Payment of Deferred Consideration Pursuant to the Proof of Claim filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on January 11, 2008, Limited has filed a proof of claim in respect of contingent, unliquidated claims (if any) (collec

be proper in the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of New York, New York or, to the extent permitted by law, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to or connected with this Agreement o

liabilities or condition of Holdings or Limited. 7. MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Payment of Deferred Consideration Pursuant to the Proof of Claim filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on January I I, 2008, Limited has filed a proof of claim in respect of contingent, unliquidated claims (if any) (colle