Epstein Secrets

Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK • THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, -v- FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. X 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN

purposes. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶ 29. ii. Disclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The Capone and Supplemental Capone Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tarta

Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK • THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, -v- FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. X 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN

purposes. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶ 29. ii. Disclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The Capone and Supplemental Capone Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tarta

AE Document 41 Filed 01/15/21 Page 1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, Plaintiff, -v- FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant. X 20 Civ. 833 (PAE) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN

enforcement purposes. See Supp. Decl. ¶ 29. ii. Disclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The and Supplemental Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tartaglione prose