Epstein Secrets

I'm here with my colleague, David McCraw. THE COURT: Very good. Good afternoon to both of you. Who do I have for the government on behalf of the Federal Bureau of Prisons? MR. afternoon. : Steven , your Honor. Good THE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. And, Mr. Walker, our court reporter, are you on the line? (Pause

d from a false reports case. I think, second, documents that appear to be assignment rosters and so forth, which you see on the first page of the Vaughn Index, again, it's not clear how those connect. Maybe they can — I think we've heard a couple of theories of possibly getting there — but we'd like

ist. LEXIS 134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 2 Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999). 8 Human Rights Watch v. DOJ Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 2 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93 (D.D.C. 2019) 9 N.

eland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66, 80 (D.D.C. 2012) ("Where an agency has publicly disclosed information that is similar to what is being withheld, its Vaughn submission must be `sufficiently detailed' to distinguish the withheld information from the public information."). CONCLUSION For the foregoing re

I'm here with my colleague, David McCraw. THE COURT: Very good. Good afternoon to both of you. Who do I have for the government on behalf of the Federal Bureau of Prisons? MR. KOCHEVAR: Steven Kochevar, your Honor. Good afternoon. THE COURT: Good afternoon, Mr. Kochevar. And, Mr. Walker, our court reporter, are y

d from a false reports case. I think, second, documents that appear to be assignment rosters and so forth, which you see on the first page of the Vaughn Index, again, it's not clear how those connect. Maybe they can — I think we've heard a couple of theories of possibly getting there — but we'd like

ist. LEXIS 134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 2 Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999). 8 Human Rights Watch v. DOJ Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 2 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93 (D.D.C. 2019) 9 N.

eland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66, 80 (D.D.C. 2012) ("Where an agency has publicly disclosed information that is similar to what is being withheld, its Vaughn submission must be `sufficiently detailed' to distinguish the withheld information from the public information."). CONCLUSION For the foregoing re

ist. LEXIS 134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 2 Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999). 8 Human Rights Watch v. DOJ Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 2 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Commerce, 375 F. Supp. 3d 93 (D.D.C. 2019) 9 N.

eland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66, 80 (D.D.C. 2012) ("Where an agency has publicly disclosed information that is similar to what is being withheld, its Vaughn submission must be `sufficiently detailed' to distinguish the withheld information from the public information."). CONCLUSION For the foregoing re