Epstein Secrets

F CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summ

tenson DecL ¶¶ 49. Each set of records satisfies the two-prong test to fall within the scope of the deliberative process privilege. First, prior to Epstekes suicide, BOP made decisions concerning how to house Epstein and whether or not to house him with a celknate. See Christenson DecL ¶¶ 49a, 49d. The i

F CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summ

tenson DecL ¶¶ 49. Each set of records satisfies the two-prong test to fall within the scope of the deliberative process privilege. First, prior to Epstekes suicide, BOP made decisions concerning how to house Epstein and whether or not to house him with a celknate. See Christenson DecL ¶¶ 49a, 49d. The i

F CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summ

tenson DecL ¶¶ 49. Each set of records satisfies the two-prong test to fall within the scope of the deliberative process privilege. First, prior to Epstekes suicide, BOP made decisions concerning how to house Epstein and whether or not to house him with a celknate. See Christenson DecL ¶¶ 49a, 49d. The i