4
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
F CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summ
st be either pending or reasonably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the gov
F CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summ
st be either pending or reasonably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the gov
F CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT BACKGROUND 2 I. Criminal Proceedings Against Jeffrey Epstein 2 II. Criminal Proceedings Against Tova Noel and Michael Thomas 2 III. Criminal Proceedings Against Nicholas Tartaglione 3 IV. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summ
st be either pending or reasonably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the gov
led 04/24/20 Page 1 of 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 19 Cr. 830 (AT) TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL THOMAS, : Defendants. x MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL THOMAS'S MOTION TO COMPEL GEOFFREY S. BER
Page: EFTA00027307 →ich governmental decisions and policies are formulated.'" Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass 'n, 532 U.S. 1, 8 (2001) (quoting N.L.R.B. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 150 (1975)). The privilege is applicable in criminal and civil cases involving the government. See, e.g., United
Page: EFTA00027333 →Entities connected to both Michael Thomas and N.L.R.B. v.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONTova Noel
PERSONFederal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATIONSpecial Housing Unit
ORGANIZATION
Metropolitan Correctional Center
ORGANIZATIONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSONNicholas Tartaglione
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
George W. Bush
PERSONAnalisa Torres
PERSON
Audrey Strauss
PERSONGarcia
PERSON
The Washington Post
ORGANIZATIONChristenson
PERSON
THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY
ORGANIZATION
Andrew Cuomo
PERSON
The New York Times
ORGANIZATIONAmnesty Int'l USA
ORGANIZATION